Monday, April 28, 2008

Land Of The Free

This is a reply to jihadcomplex, whose arguments can be found here.

You certainly make a valid point with your assessment that minorities living in impoverished areas idolizing “gangsta” rap and “gangsta” movies is a problem, but it’s not a problem for the reasons you seem to think. The problem is that these are stupid people whose schools have been underfunded and whose parents (or, more commonly, parent) fail to instill within them any sort of work ethic. Often, the only way to be somewhat insulated from the affects of gang violence is to actually belong to a gang, and since the crime rate is so catastrophically high, there are few small businesses operating in these areas, and therefore few jobs. Often times, the only means of making money is to sell drugs or steal.

The whole thing forms a vicious cycle that is incapable of endings without the intervention of an outside force of some kind. Violence and theft begets poverty and poverty begets violence and theft.

Now, you can play your little tough guy routine and give us all that slow-clap speech about personal responsibility and some crowd-pleasing snide and sarcastic “boo-hoos” that mock rather than address the problem—but that is beneath you and if you do it again, I will call you on it in a big way.

The fact of the matter is that I don’t give a fuck about you, let alone a bunch of criminal scum infesting our prisons. What I am interested in is a logical and ethical solution to a very real set of problems that I will now outline:

1. Prisons are horrifically over-crowded.
2. Recidivism rates are abysmally high.
3. People like you are behaving as a detriment to any sort of actionable solution with your stubborn revenge-obsessed bullshit.

In order to solve these problems, we must ask why they exist in the first place.

So, why are prisons over-crowded. Let us examine that question with the following statistics:







As you can see in the chart above, the United States (laaaaand of the freeeee) has less than 5 percent of the world's population, but it accounts for nearly 25% of the world’s prison population. If you’re reading that and you’re not outraged, then your sole focus in life should be to avoid breeding at all costs, because the world doesn’t need more idiots like you.

Was it always like this? Were we always so fond of our "lock 'em up and throw away the key" philosophy of crime and punishment? The simple answer to that question is a resounding "NO".
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A record 7 million people - or one in every 32 American adults - were behind bars, on probation or on parole by the end of last year, according to the Justice Department. Of those, 2.2 million were in prison or jail, an increase of 2.7 percent over the previous year, according to a report released Wednesday.

More than 4.1 million people were on probation and 784,208 were on parole at the end of 2005. Prison releases are increasing, but admissions are increasing more.
What are these people going to prison for? Let's find out!

since 1970, our prison population has increased by 700%. You're not reading that wrong. It has literally become 8 times larger in just 38 years. (HINT: The US Population has only grown by about 30-40% in that time--statistically negligible in the face of our previous number.)

YOU: Hey, TJ, what year was the war on drugs instituted again?

I'm glad you ask, my child. It was instituted in 1972.

YOU: But, TJ, now that we've put these violent criminals in prison, crime in this country has gone down! So the war on drugs is working! Yay!

WRONG. According to a report released by the JFA Institute (http://www.jfa-associates.com/)
Proponents of prison expansion have heralded this growth as a smashing success. But a large number of studies contradict that claim. Most scientific evidence suggests that there is little if any relationship between fluctuations in crime rates and incarceration rates. In many cases, crime rates have risen or declined independent of imprisonment rates. New York City, for example, has produced one of the nation’s largest declines in crime in the nation while significantly reducing its jail and prison populations. Connecticut, New Jersey, Ohio, and Massachusetts have also reduced their prison populations during the same time that crime rates were declining.
So, goddamn, it just doesn't seem to be working.

The next question on our agenda is why are recidivism rates so abysmally and staggeringly high? First of all, let's take a look at exactly how high these rates are:
Of the 272,111 persons released from prisons in 15 States in 1994, an estimated 67.5% were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years, 46.9% were reconvicted, and 25.4% resentenced to prison for a new crime.
These are inexcusably bad results and when compared to the recidivism rates of most countries, like Sweden below, spell it out loud and clear: THIS SHIT AIN'T FUCKING WORKING. Check it out:

An average of 22 per cent of those convicted of offences between 1991 and 2001 reoffended within a year of the initial conviction. The proportion reoffending within a three year follow-up period was approximately one-third (an average of 35 per cent). This means that in slightly over half of the cases of recidivism noted within a three-year period, the first reoffence occurs within a year of the initial conviction.
67.5% Recidivism in America vs. 22% Recidivism in Sweden. Could it be that they're doing something right and that we're doing something wrong?

Could fucking be:

How could this be? Surely this is not a typical Swedish prison? Sorry, but is surely is. And it's a prison that manages to reform more criminals than it's dirtier, danker, more insidious American equivalent.

How? Because instead of seeking to punish, these prisons seek to reform. Psychologists have told us for years that punishment is ineffective as a deterrent, but we as a nation continue to think we know better than what mere scientists have to say! We've got something better than science--we've got a gut instinct, a whole lot of hatred and a serious lack of empathy for our fellow man. We don't care that punishment is ineffective, because it feels so goddamn good.

And why are we this way? Why are we such vile, contemptuous pieces of amoral shit who don't care about whether or not our fellow human beings succeed or fail? Why are we so callous that we stand idily by while our government imprisons more people per capita than any other country on the face of this entire planet by a significant margin?

Those questions, you'll have to answer for yourself.









19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Fucking stupid war on drugs. Wasting millions of dollars and putting non violent offenders behind bars!

Who cares if you do drugs in the privacy of your own home? I don't care. Why is pot considered worse than tobacco or alcohol?

It's like we know prohibition of alocohol was a bad idea, but we're too stupid to make the connection to other recreational drugs...

Cody said...

Just legalize drugs. Who gives a flying fuck. Not heroin though. That shit is evil.

Or even at the least, instill more care for these people than punishment.

Anonymous said...

I've noticed you seem to be hung up on the catch phrase "personal responsibility". When someone says, "these impoverished criminals need to take a little personal responsibility" you hear "these impoverished criminals need to fend for themselves and solve their own problems." In this particular case you see these problems as insurmountable without outside intervention. The outside intervention, of course, will come at your hands, because even though you are a upper middle class white kid, you know what's best for the broken minority culture overcrowding our prisons. Only your superior powers of reason, logic, and ethics can determine the truth.

Don't you see the total lack of humility you're expressing here?

In some other writings you likened personal responsibility to "every man for himself." When most compassionate people hear that phrase, they think of a sinking ship, and how awful it must be. We should help each other. We should cooperate. We should work as a team.

And we do, on a small scale. People care about the people they know. They will go out of their way to help their family and their friends. They will do things that are contrary to their own self interests if it betters their group.

The trouble comes when you apply these same concepts to society on a national scale. These people we are talking about here - they are just as far removed from you as they are from me - we don't meet them. We don't interact with them. A single day any one of them spends in prison only impacts us once a year, on April 15th, and it's so far abstracted to a few millionths of a penny that we hardly notice.

We read their stories and maybe our heartstrings are tugged. We hear on the news that the prisons are overcrowded and we think, "oh, this is a problem we must solve!" But we don't really care. We're not going to lose sleep over it.

Anyone who claims to have strong empathetic ties to people they hear about on the news are patently lying.

What does that have to do with personal responsibility? I'll tell you. The people who talk about it are recognizing the fact that when it comes to really big, hard decisions - like picking yourself up from the bootstraps and getting out of the ghetto - the only person who can ever make that decision and stick to it is you. At the end of the day, the only person who really, truly cares about you is you.

So, the problem is overcrowded prisons, right? The only way that problem will ever get solved is if an individual who might otherwise be facing a life of crime and ultimately a prison term wakes up one morning and says to himself, "self, I'm not going to prison. Screw that."

Young future criminals need to decide for themselves that the world around them is toxic and get out. It happens, in small numbers, but culture is a very powerful thing. People will fight to the death to defend it, regardless of how objectively inferior it may be to the culture of the aggressors. You, my honkey friend, are the culture of the aggressors, and these people who treat prison as just another cultural rite of passage will defend their way of doing things - even if that way of doing things leads to incarceration.

You think you're going to change that with bar charts and a few exercises in logic and maybe a paragraph or two about ethics, maybe touch on racism a little? Maybe spend a few million tax dollars on some after school programs and halfway houses?
Fruitless pursuits, my friend. Fruitless since 1972.

This is a cultural battle, and as long as we live in America, the Land of the Free, we (the whiteys in charge) can't do anything to win it. We have no weapons. None that work, anyway. If we are ever going to see a change in the fact that millions of Americans see four years prison in the same way millions of Americans see four years in college, the change is going to have to come from within the prison culture, not from without.

Believing that you and your mighty wit can conjure up a "solution" to the "problem" is sheer, unbridled hubris you'd be better off without.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, I don't understand the problem you have with this article? The prison system plays a major role in crime rates because it's suppose to discourage people from reoffending and clearly it's not working. Why shouldn't it be addressed just because it's not the ultimate solution to everything?

Anonymous said...

My entire point is that the culture that fills our prisons has evolved to believe that prison is not punishment, it's a rite of passage. The people who are committing these crimes do not believe that their lifestyle is criminal because their culture accepts it. When the only mistake you believe you've made is that you've gotten caught, what, exactly, are you going to reform?

My point is that the culture of prison-bound people is the problem, not the ineffectiveness of the prison reform. Thanks to our constitution we can't make prisons much worse without droves of protest-prone idiots whining about cruel and unusual punishment.

So, we lock criminals up, but the prisons aren't really that bad - not much worse than the streets from which they come - and in many communities with high felon populations, going to prison is seen as a requirement for manhood. We can't make the prisons much worse without violating our Constitution (not to mention putting up with civil disobedience). If we don't lock them up, what do we do with them?

"Reform" them? That's my entire point - it can't be done. To imagine that you can change someone's culture simply because you can prove "logically" that their culture needs changing is not only arrogant, it's futile.

Anonymous said...

On the subject of the Swedish prisons;
It's kind of funny, a few weeks ago there was a documentary of sorts, in lack of a better word, on our prison system and how we're getting more rigid and concerned about "safety", building major safety prisons for more prisoners than we've ever had which have been deemed so dangerous they would have to be imprisoned in such a facility.
Anyway, it's far from the american prison-system, but at the moment Sweden is taking a major turn toward the wrong path in my opinion, and that's not only when it come to safety-policies.

Ah, and you should've mentioned that rehabilitation island in Norway!

Anonymous said...

lets have a rave man....party on dudes...legalize the seed...

Anonymous said...

To be fair, Sweden is a very different society, with a much lower violent crime rate, higher percentage of atheism etc, I don't think making prisons exactly like the Swedish ones will necessarily work for the US. Of course, they should definitely be redone to maximise rehab potential, but the solution will probably be a bit different to Sweden's

HeilFire said...

I just went to an American prison on Wednesday and I have knowledge to share. It was a new one (built in the 80's-90's) and seemed pretty nice. The prisoners were very nice, surprisingly. The reason for their attitude was probably because all of them were awaiting trial. It was a temporary prison for federal offenders. After they were sentenced, they would be sent to a more permanent prison.

The place was actually pretty nice. It had white walls and tile floors, with a drop ceiling. It looked just like any other public building (like a school or an office building)

The thing that really shocked me was that they had strip searches and cavity searches every time they have a visit with anyone, even when behind the glass.

The state pays private companies (such as the one that owned the jail I visited) about $85-100 per prisoner per day. that averages to around $30,000 a year on each inmate. The prisons are making a huge profit off these people. The prison I went to spent around $35 an inmate per day. I imagine this profit covers overhead such as building costs for the jail. Still, the amount of money we could save if the government simply took over the system would be great.

It was a "maximum security" prison and we only went through 2 sliding doors. A determined inmate could have easily made his way through.

Legalize drugs.
Lessen sentences.
Let the state take control of prisons.

Anonymous said...

Another problem is the whole profit-based prison industry. This discussion sums it up nicely.

Anonymous said...

Widen your margins just a tad. Making your faithful readers scroll and scroll and scroll and scroll creates a negative experience. Blog more, you're doing well.

Anonymous said...

Sup TJ. Another mindless fan from youtube who just began reading your shit.

Alceste said...

Your Atom feed of this blog seems to be fubar. The latest post Google Reader finds is "God Damn America".

Anonymous said...

To be fully honest, the Swedish prisons don't always look like that... Some do though...

Cody said...

"Take our boy TheAmazingAtheist. I promise you that he has spent hours and hours of his life inside his own head trying to come up with justifications for why dropping out of high school was the right and true action. Why he's fat. Why he hasn't gotten laid in 5 years. Why he is 23 and still living with his mother. Etc. etc. etc. His justifications are probably quite logical and really brilliant and he probably does believe them, but that's only the part of him that is easy to convince. That part is called our intellect. Deep down, he has regrets, and he knows he fucked up. But admitting that is depressing. It's just too hard."

This is a comment on my blog if you are interested in responding to this Christian, evan, who seems to be dissing on you.

link
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3218797192658899684&postID=3843058830841330234

aceology said...

Very intersting,I had no clue.

Ash Tha God said...

Nice article TJ. The drug war [and vice crimes in general] and the American justice is obviously deeply flawed. The tough-guy, throw-em-all-in-jail approach simply doesn't work and serves merely to exacerbate the problem. Drug prohibition does more social harm than the actual drugs could ever do. And the American penal system's paradigm of incarceration rather than rehabilitation does nothing to help better the conditions of our society. Just fucking legalize drugs, goddamnit!! What's the fucking problem with people?

k4ns4s said...

theAmazingEssayist, it seems.

Garam Ri said...

Micheal Moore isn't a very credible source, but he made a really interesting video about the norwegian prison system:

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=k4L6-0WRfSA

very good.